Görtz: Virtual Shoe Fitting

In September last year I had written about a Nike Sneaker Customization concept from Miami Ad School. Since then, ad agency kempertrautmann, along with German shoe retailer Görtz, creates the same virtual shoe store at Hamburg Central Station and transforms a digital billboard into a point of sale for shoes.

A station billboard that behaves like a shop window

Using Microsoft Kinect gesture controls, the shopper’s feet are scanned and reproduced on the screen. A selection of shoes is then presented to try on and compare virtually. A social component lets shoppers share a snapshot of themselves with the shoes on Facebook. Those who decide to buy receive a QR code that leads to a mobile checkout, with next-day delivery.

Virtual shoe fitting is an interactive retail experience that overlays a chosen shoe style onto a live on-screen view of your feet, so you can judge look and proportion before purchasing.

In European retail environments where commuters split time between offline browsing and mobile checkout, the strongest executions connect fast “try” moments to a low-friction purchase path.

Why it lands: it compresses the path from curiosity to checkout

The idea removes the biggest barrier in out-of-home retail, which is the gap between “that looks interesting” and “I can actually get it”. The Kinect scan creates a personal moment, the virtual try-on creates confidence, and the QR code turns intent into an immediate transaction rather than a promise to remember later. That matters because each step reduces the drop-off that usually happens between public interest and private purchase.

Extractable takeaway: If you want digital out-of-home to sell, not just impress, design the experience so the last step is not “find us later”. Make the last step “buy now”, with the minimum possible handoff friction.

What the campaign is really proving

The real question is whether a public screen can do enough selling work in the moment to replace the need for a later retail visit.

It is less about tech novelty and more about role change. The billboard stops being a broadcast surface and starts behaving like a staffed shop assistant. It recognizes you, helps you evaluate options, and hands you a clear next step to purchase.

This works best when the technology serves the buying decision, not when it becomes the point of the experience.

What this retail screen gets right

  • Personalize instantly: a scan, a fit, a quick moment that feels made for the passer-by.
  • Keep choices bounded: a curated range beats a full catalog when people are in a hurry.
  • Build a shareable artifact: snapshots extend the experience beyond the station.
  • Make the handoff obvious: QR-to-checkout should feel like the natural next click, not a separate journey.
  • Promise something operationally real: next-day delivery turns “stunt” into “service”.

A few fast answers before you act

What is the core idea?

A digital billboard in a train station becomes a virtual shoe store. Shoppers try on shoes using gesture control, then complete purchase on mobile via a QR code.

Why use Kinect in a public space?

Because it enables hands-free interaction and creates a personal “fit” moment without requiring an app download or typing in a rushed environment.

What makes this different from a normal QR poster?

The poster does not only link out. It provides evaluation first. The virtual try-on is the persuasion layer, and the QR code is the conversion layer.

What is the biggest execution risk?

Latency and calibration. If the scan feels inaccurate or the overlay looks wrong, the experience loses trust and the checkout step will not happen.

What should you measure?

Interaction starts, completed try-ons, QR scans, checkout completion rate, and next-day delivery satisfaction. Those metrics show whether the billboard is acting as a true point of sale.

dotHIV: .hiv Domain

A familiar website address. One small change at the end. And suddenly the act of browsing is framed as a contribution.

.hiv is a global idea positioned to fight HIV and AIDS. Campaign materials claimed that by the end of 2010, the number of people diagnosed with HIV would have reached 150 million.

AIDS continued to be a deadly diagnosis, so nonprofit organization dotHIV and Hamburg-based agency KemperTrautmann launched a Facebook-led campaign with a specific ambition. Establish a new top-level domain, .hiv, alongside endings such as .com or .org.

The proposed mechanism is straightforward. Any website could soon have a .hiv version. The content stays the same, but using the .hiv version is framed as “doing some good”. Every visit would trigger a small donation to dotHIV, or the website owner would pay a monthly rate for using the .hiv ending, with proceeds routed toward the cause.

Why the domain idea is the message

This works because it turns a familiar object, the URL, into a symbol. A domain ending is tiny, but it is also persistent. It appears everywhere the link appears, and it travels without needing a new explanation each time. The “digital red ribbon” effect is built into the mechanics, not added on top. Here, “digital red ribbon” means a visible, repeatable sign of support that appears wherever the link appears. That matters because persistent, low-effort visibility lowers the cognitive cost of participation and helps the cause travel with the behavior.

Extractable takeaway: If you want scale for a social cause, design participation so it sits inside a behavior people already repeat daily, and make the proof of participation visible every time the behavior happens.

In global cause-led digital initiatives, the scalable advantage comes from attaching support to a habit people already repeat without thinking.

What the campaign is really trying to unlock

The real question is whether the cause can become part of a daily digital behavior instead of remaining a separate appeal.

The visible pitch is fundraising. The deeper play is normalization. If .hiv becomes a usable, recognizable address ending, it makes the cause present in everyday digital life, which can reduce stigma through repetition and visibility rather than messaging alone.

The more strategic value here is normalization, not just fundraising.

What cause-led marketers can borrow

  • Attach impact to habit. Make the “good” happen when people do something they already do.
  • Make participation visible. A marker people can see and share helps the idea spread without extra media.
  • Keep the mechanism explainable in one sentence. If it needs a diagram, adoption collapses.
  • Design for opt-in trust. Cause mechanics live or die on clarity about where money flows and why.

A few fast answers before you act

What is the .hiv idea in one line?

A proposed top-level domain intended to turn everyday browsing into support for HIV and AIDS work by routing fees or visit-linked donations through dotHIV.

How is it supposed to work for normal websites?

A site could have a .hiv version that mirrors the existing content, while usage or registration is framed as generating funds for dotHIV.

Why use a domain ending instead of a normal donation page?

Because a domain ending is persistent and repeatable. It can travel with links and become a visible marker of participation everywhere it appears.

What makes this idea credible or not credible to audiences?

Transparency about governance, pricing, and where proceeds go. The mechanism needs to be as clear as the promise.

What is the biggest risk with “donation-by-browsing” concepts?

If the value exchange is unclear, or the impact feels too small or too opaque, people disengage or suspect cause-washing.