Google: Project Re:Brief

In 2011, Google partnered with four global brands in an advertising experiment. Their goal was simple. How can the ideas that defined the advertising industry in its infancy inspire a whole new generation of creatives and marketers?

So Google set out to re-imagine and remake some of the most iconic ad campaigns from the 1960s and 1970s with today’s technology, led by the same creative legends who made these campaigns.

Re-briefing classics with modern tools

The premise is a clean creative constraint. Here, a re-brief means keeping the original strategic promise while rewriting the assignment for today’s interfaces, devices, and distribution. Take an idea that became culturally famous in its original medium, then re-brief it as if you were building it for a digitally connected world. Not by “updating the look”, but by asking what the original strategy would do if it had today’s interfaces, devices, and distribution.

In global brand advertising, revisiting iconic work is a practical way to test which storytelling principles survive a major technology shift.

The four remakes

With that said, here are the results of the best of the old with the best of the new.

Re-imagining Coca-Cola’s “Hilltop”

Re-imagining Volvo’s “Drive it Like You Hate it”

Re-imagining Alka-Seltzer “I Can’t Believe I Ate That Whole Thing”

Re-imagining Avis “We Try Harder”

Why this format works for marketers

The real question is not whether old campaigns deserve a digital remake, but whether the original strategic idea still produces useful behavior in a connected medium. It forces discipline. You cannot hide behind novelty because the original idea is already known and already strong. That pushes the work to earn its keep through mechanics, not decoration. That works because a proven idea gives the technology a clear job to do, so the audience experiences the promise through behavior rather than explanation. When the core idea is clear, technology becomes an amplifier, not a replacement for strategy.

Extractable takeaway: If you want to explore new tech without producing gimmicks, start with an idea that already proved its emotional truth, then design one modern interaction that makes that truth more immediate.

How to borrow the approach without copying it

  • Pick one timeless promise. Strip it down until it fits in a single sentence.
  • Define one modern behavior. Sharing, scanning, tapping, responding, connecting. Build around one.
  • Make the mechanic do the explaining. The best remakes do not need a voiceover to justify the tech.
  • Keep a clear before and after. What stays from the original idea, and what changes because of the medium.

A few fast answers before you act

What is Project Re:Brief?

A Google-led experiment that re-imagines classic campaigns from the 1960s and 1970s using modern technology, guided by the original creative legends behind those ads.

Why remake old ads instead of creating new ones?

Because the originals provide a proven strategic baseline. You can see whether technology strengthens the core idea, or distracts from it.

What does “re-brief” actually mean in practice?

It means taking the original strategy and re-writing the assignment for a new media reality, then building a modern mechanic that expresses the same core promise.

What should a team learn from this kind of exercise?

That strong ideas travel across formats, and that the role of technology is to make the benefit more immediate, more personal, or more connected, not merely more complex.

How do you judge whether a modern remake is successful?

Look for clarity of the core idea, the usefulness of the interaction, and whether the mechanic creates behavior people would repeat or share, not just view.

Evian: Roller-skating Babies

A viral ad that hit Guinness-level scale

Evian’s “Roller-skating Babies” viral ad, created by Euro RSCG, has been recognised by the Guinness Book of Records as the most viewed online ad to date.

Adding up views for various versions of the ad across video sharing websites, the ad has got 45,166,109 views as of 9 November 2009.

How “viral” is engineered when the idea is instantly repeatable

The mechanism is concept compression. By concept compression, I mean reducing the whole hook to a phrase people can repeat accurately. “Roller-skating babies” is a one-line idea that travels intact. You do not need explanation, context, or a brand preamble to understand why you should click. Because the hook survives in one line, it removes explanation friction, which is why forwarding feels effortless.

Across global FMCG brands, the difference between “viral” and bought reach is whether people willingly forward the idea as social currency, a quick signal of taste or humour.

The real question is whether your idea can be retold in one line, so people share it as a signal, not as a favour.

Why it lands: novelty, craft, and the urge to pass it on

It works because it is strange enough to be worth sharing and polished enough to reward rewatching. The viewer gets an immediate payoff, then uses the link as a way to say, “you have to see this”.

Extractable takeaway: Shareability increases when the payoff arrives immediately and the idea can be recommended in a sentence without explanation.

The business intent: fame that feels earned, not placed

This is not a conversion mechanic. It is a reach and memorability play. The goal is to make the brand part of a piece of entertainment people choose to spread, so the exposure feels voluntary rather than interrupted.

What to steal if you want scale without buying it all

  • Build a one-sentence idea. If the concept cannot be repeated accurately in one line, it loses speed.
  • Design for sharing friction. The viewer should know what it is and why it is fun within seconds.
  • Make it rewatchable. Repeat viewing is a multiplier for social forwarding.
  • Measure across versions. If the asset spreads in multiple uploads, track the total footprint, not just one link.

A few fast answers before you act

What is Evian’s “Roller-skating Babies” in one sentence?

A highly shareable online film built on a single, instantly repeatable concept: babies roller-skating, executed with polished craft for rewatch value.

What is the core mechanism behind its scale?

Concept compression. The idea travels intact in a few words, so people can forward it as social currency without needing explanation.

Why does it land so reliably with viewers?

It combines novelty with high production value. The viewer gets an immediate payoff, then uses the link as a quick “you have to see this” recommendation.

What should marketers learn about measuring “viral”?

Track across versions and re-uploads. When a film spreads in multiple places, total footprint matters more than one canonical link.

What is the most transferable takeaway?

Build a one-line idea that is easy to retell, then execute it well enough that people want to rewatch and pass it on.