Durex Fundawear

Durex Fundawear

If t-shirts can be digitised, then why can’t underwear. Durex Australia has unveiled “Fundawear”, billed as a first-of-its-kind wearable electronic underwear concept that allows touch to be transferred over the internet while maintaining comfort, sexiness and flexibility. The idea is simple. People in long-distance relationships can tease, tickle and tantalise even when apart.

To replicate the nuances of touch, each garment houses touch technology that connects with a real-time server to communicate between touchscreen devices and the garments. Interaction happens through a smartphone interface, translating inputs into sensation on the connected wearable.

A prototype that behaves like a campaign

What makes this work stand out is the choice to launch as an experiment, not a finished product. Fundawear is framed as a prototype, which gives the brand permission to be bold, invite participation, and trigger debate, without pretending the tech is already mainstream.

Extractable takeaway: When a product concept is unfamiliar, framing it as a prototype lowers disbelief and lets curiosity do the distribution work.

The real question is whether people can understand the use case quickly enough to talk about it.

It also shifts the job of the communications. Instead of persuading people that “remote touch” is a good idea, it makes people imagine use cases. That imagination is the marketing engine.

How the technology story earns attention

The campaign leans on a clear mechanism. Touch input on a phone maps to specific zones, then the garment responds, creating a feedback loop, meaning the phone input and garment response feel connected in the same moment rather than as a delayed message.

When wearable technology is explained this clearly, it stops sounding like science fiction and starts sounding like an interface decision. That is when people share it.

In consumer innovation marketing, the leap from novelty to adoption happens when a physical interface makes a digital promise feel immediate, controllable, and consent-led.

Distribution strategy: invite the internet to co-author the idea

Fundawear is described as still in the experimental stage, with no confirmed release date at the time. But Durex uses that uncertainty as a hook. If you provide a creative reply to “How would you use Fundawear with your partner?” at the Durex Facebook page, you might win a free prototype.

That is a smart move. It turns the public into contributors, and it generates word of mouth that carries the concept further than a conventional product launch could.

What to steal if you are launching an unfamiliar product concept

  • Prototype publicly. Experiments can travel faster than “finished” products because people argue, imagine, and remix.
  • Explain the mechanism in one breath. If the audience cannot repeat how it works, they will not share it.
  • Design for participation. A prompt like “how would you use it?” converts curiosity into content.
  • Keep the tone playful, not clinical. For intimate categories, playfulness lowers the barrier to talk about it.

A few fast answers before you act

What is Fundawear, in plain terms?

Fundawear is an experimental wearable concept from Durex Australia. It pairs smart underwear with a smartphone interface so a partner can send touch inputs over the internet in real time.

What kind of technology does it rely on?

It relies on wearable haptics, meaning small actuators in the garment respond to signals from an app. A server connection synchronises inputs between two partners’ devices and garments.

Why launch a prototype instead of waiting for a finished product?

Because a prototype creates permission to experiment, earn press, and test cultural appetite. It also turns uncertainty into participation, which can generate more talk than a polished launch.

What is the biggest brand risk with intimate wearable tech?

Trust. The concept has to feel safe and consent-led, and the communication has to avoid any hint of surveillance or misuse. If trust breaks, the idea becomes a cautionary tale.

What is the core marketing lesson from Fundawear?

When the product is unfamiliar, the first job is not persuasion. It is making the mechanism and the imagined benefit instantly understandable, so people do the distribution for you.

TAC: How to Plan a Funeral

TAC: How to Plan a Funeral

In September 2012, the Transport Accident Commission (TAC) in Australia runs a Pinterest campaign with a line that lands like a punch: How to plan a funeral.

The idea is aimed at girlfriends and mothers of young men. The case frames the problem bluntly. Young men are far more likely to die in a crash than young women, and speeding is positioned as a primary contributor to those fatalities.

How Pinterest becomes a road-safety channel

The mechanism uses Pinterest boards that look like practical inspiration for funerals. Images and pins map to real funeral-planning themes, then steer toward the campaign’s message: “I’d hate to plan your funeral. Slowing down won’t kill you.” That works because the planning format lowers resistance before the safety message lands.

In road-safety behavior change, the most effective interventions often come from trusted relationships rather than institutional authority.

Why it lands

It shifts the emotional weight. Instead of telling a driver what TAC wants, it lets a partner or parent express what they fear. Pinterest is a deliberate platform choice because the boards feel like a real place someone would browse for “ideas”, which makes the moment of recognition more personal and more unsettling.

Extractable takeaway: If you need behavior change, route the message through the person with social permission to say it, meaning someone whose concern will be heard as care rather than control. Then build the media experience so it feels like everyday browsing, not an “ad break”.

What the campaign is really optimizing for

This is not trying to win an argument about enforcement. It is trying to trigger a conversation at home. The work uses a shareable, repeatable line that people can copy in their own words, because a close person saying it carries more force than a government body broadcasting it.

The real question is how to make the warning come from someone the driver will actually hear before the risky behavior happens.

The stronger strategic move here is to design for the relationship, not for the institution.

What to steal for your own safety or health campaign

  • Design for the messenger. Decide who the audience will actually listen to, then craft the creative for that relationship.
  • Choose a platform that matches the behavior. If the message is “planning” and “ideas”, a board format can feel native.
  • Use one line people can borrow. If supporters cannot repeat it verbatim or paraphrase it easily, it will not travel.
  • Make the consequence concrete. “Funeral planning” is an action. It forces imagination to do the work.

A few fast answers before you act

What is the core idea of How to Plan a Funeral?

A TAC Pinterest presence that looks like funeral-planning inspiration, designed to help girlfriends and mothers deliver a more impactful “slow down” message to young men.

Why use Pinterest instead of a typical road-safety ad format?

Because the browsing context feels personal and practical. That makes the emotional message land as something a loved one would stumble into and share, not something an authority announces.

What is the key insight behind the campaign line?

A close relationship can say what an institution cannot. “I’d hate to plan your funeral” is a social message first, and a safety message second.

Who is the message really meant to activate?

Girlfriends and mothers of young men. The campaign is built for the people whose concern is more likely to be heard as care than control.

What is the biggest risk in copying this approach?

If the platform context feels forced or exploitative, people disengage. The creative must feel native to the behavior on that platform, and the tone must stay respectful.

Track My Macca’s: Supply Chain Transparency

Track My Macca’s: Supply Chain Transparency

McDonald’s in Australia decided to use technology to tackle one of its biggest problems, the disbelief that its ingredients are fresh, locally sourced and of decent quality. So with image recognition, GPS, augmented reality and some serious integration with its supply chain, they put together a full story behind every ingredient people came across while buying food at McDonald’s.

The real challenge: trust, not awareness

This is not a campaign built to shout louder. It is built to answer the skeptical question that sits in the customer’s head at the moment of choice: “Is this actually fresh, and where did it come from?”

The real question is: how do you turn a trust objection into verifiable context at the point of purchase?

Instead of responding with claims, it responds with traceable context. Ingredient by ingredient.

Why the tech stack matters only if it is integrated

Image recognition, GPS, and augmented reality are the attention layer. The credibility layer is the supply chain integration. Here, “supply chain integration” means the experience is pulling from the same operational sourcing and logistics records the business runs on. Without that, the experience would be a glossy story. With it, the experience becomes proof.

If the experience is not tied to operational data, it becomes transparency theater rather than trust building.

  • Image recognition. Identify what the customer is looking at or buying.
  • GPS. Connect the experience to location and local sourcing claims.
  • Augmented reality. Make information feel immediate and tangible in the buying moment.
  • Supply chain integration. Ensure the “story” maps to real sourcing and logistics data.

In high-volume consumer businesses, credibility is won or lost in the buying moment, not on an “about our ingredients” page.

What makes this a strong model for brand transparency

Transparency only works when it is easy. People will not dig through PDFs or corporate sustainability pages while they are ordering lunch.

Extractable takeaway: When trust is the barrier, bring proof to the point of choice and back it with operational data that can stand up to scrutiny.

What to take from this if you run CX, MarTech, or operations

  1. Start with the objection. The customer’s doubt defines the experience.
  2. Proof beats promise. If you want trust, show traceability, not slogans.
  3. Integrate the system of record. Experiences that depend on trust must connect to operational data.
  4. Design for the moment of choice. The best transparency is delivered exactly when people need it.

Here, “system of record” means the operational data sources that govern sourcing and logistics, not a marketing layer that can drift from reality.


A few fast answers before you act

What is “Track My Macca’s”?

It is a McDonald’s Australia initiative that uses mobile technology to show a story behind ingredients, aiming to build trust in freshness, local sourcing, and quality.

Which technologies were used?

Image recognition, GPS, augmented reality, and strong integration with McDonald’s supply chain to connect the experience to real sourcing and logistics.

Why is supply chain integration the critical piece?

Because the experience depends on credibility. Without operational data behind it, the story would feel like marketing. With it, it can function as proof.

What customer problem does this solve?

It addresses disbelief about ingredient freshness and quality by making provenance and context visible at the point of purchase.

What is the transferable lesson for other brands?

If trust is your barrier, design transparency into the customer journey and connect it to your systems of record, so the experience can stand up to scrutiny.