Tag: customer experience

Zappos Thanksgiving Baggage Claim

Thanksgiving Eve is one of the most stressful days to travel. So Zappos shows up in a place most people associate with impatience. The baggage claim carousel.

At Houston’s George Bush Intercontinental Airport, Zappos turns sections of a baggage carousel into a roulette-style game. Parts of the moving belt are marked with prizes and slogans. When your suitcase arrives and lands on a prize square, you win what it lands on. That can be a product prize or a gift card. Suddenly, the worst part of the journey becomes the most watchable part.

Why the idea works

The activation flips the emotional context. Baggage claim is pure friction. Zappos turns it into anticipation. People are already looking at the carousel. They are already waiting. The brand simply changes what “waiting” feels like by adding suspense and a tangible upside.

The CX mechanics are simple by design

  • No app. No instructions. You just wait as usual.
  • Instant feedback. Your bag lands. You know if you win.
  • Social energy. People around you start watching your outcome too, because it is a shared moment.

What to steal

  • Pick a real pain point where attention is already guaranteed, then redesign the emotion of that moment.
  • Make participation automatic. If people must opt in, you lose most of the crowd.
  • Use a reward that is immediate and credible, so the surprise feels real, not promotional.

A few fast answers before you act

What is the Zappos Thanksgiving baggage claim activation?

A roulette-style baggage carousel game at an airport on Thanksgiving Eve where travelers win prizes based on where their luggage lands.

Why is baggage claim such a strong place for this?

It is a high-friction moment with captive attention. Everyone is already watching the belt and waiting.

What is the core experience design principle?

Reduce friction by changing the emotion of the same behaviour. Waiting stays the same, but it becomes suspense and delight instead of irritation.

Macy’s iBeacon: Retail Enters Micro-Location

iBeacon moves from concept to real retail

Apple is working to bring iBeacon technology into retail stores. But the first real-world deployment lands fast.

On November 20, Shopkick deploys an iBeacon system at Macy’s, effectively bringing beacon-driven retail experiences live before Apple’s own retail rollout becomes mainstream.

At Macy’s, the implementation is branded as shopBeacon.

What iBeacon makes possible in-store

iBeacon, introduced with iOS 7, uses Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) signaling to enable micro-location services inside stores.

That matters because it changes what mobile in-store experiences can do. Stores can deliver information and value based on a shopper’s precise location inside the environment, not just on GPS-level proximity.

Micro-location enables location-specific deals and discounts, product recommendations by aisle or department, loyalty rewards triggered by presence, and contextual content that enhances the shopping journey.

The promise is simple. The store becomes a responsive, context-aware interface.

What makes Macy’s deployment noteworthy

This is not a lab demo. It is a live retail environment.

The shopBeacon trial runs as a closed beta at Macy’s Herald Square in New York and Macy’s Union Square in San Francisco.

This marks the shift from talking about beacons to operationally testing them in flagship stores, where footfall, density, and shopper intent are real.

In brick-and-mortar retail, micro-location only matters when it is permissioned, useful, and tied to measurable in-store behavior change.

The strategic signal for retailers and brands

Beacon technology is not another channel. It is an in-store intelligence layer.

If executed with permission and relevance, it can reduce friction in discovery and decision-making, increase the utility of mobile without forcing shoppers to search, and bridge physical browsing with digital personalization.

If executed poorly, it becomes noise. The win condition is not proximity. It is context plus permission plus usefulness.

A few fast answers before you act

What does “micro-location” mean in a store context?

It means detecting a shopper’s location at aisle or department level, not just “near the store”, enabling experiences that change based on where the shopper is standing.

Why is BLE central to iBeacon-style deployments?

Bluetooth Low Energy enables persistent, low-power proximity signals that make in-aisle triggers and experiences feasible without draining devices.

Is the main value just pushing offers?

No. Offers are one use case. The stronger value is contextual service, guidance, and relevance when it reduces shopping friction.

What should retailers measure in early pilots?

Opt-in rates, perceived usefulness, impact on dwell and conversion, and whether the experience feels helpful rather than intrusive.

What is the quickest way for this to fail?

When it becomes noisy, repetitive, or unpermissioned. Proximity alone is not value. Context and usefulness are the win condition.

Checkout-Free Stores: 2 Startups Shape Retail

In-store shopping changes when the phone becomes the checkout

With smartphone penetration crossing the halfway point, two new start-ups push to change how we shop in-store.

The shift is simple. The phone is no longer just a companion to shopping. It becomes the point-of-sale, the service layer, and the trigger for fulfillment inside the store.

In omnichannel retail operations, the biggest shopper experience gains often come from removing time sinks like queues and size-hunting, not from adding more screens.

QThru

QThru is a mobile point-of-sale platform that helps consumers at grocery and retail stores to shop, scan and check out using their Android and iOS smartphones…

The ambition is clear. Remove queues. Remove friction.

Shoppers move through the store with the same control they have online. Browse, scan, pay, and leave without the classic checkout bottleneck.

Hointer

Hointer automates jean shopping through QR codes.

When scanned using the store’s app, the jean is delivered in the chosen size to a fitting room in the store and the customer is alerted to which room to visit.

Once the jeans have been tried, customers can either send the jeans back into the system or swipe their card using a machine in each fitting room to make a purchase.

This approach removes two of the most frustrating in-store steps. Finding the right size and waiting to pay.

The store behaves like a responsive system rather than a manual process.

A few fast answers before you act

What is the common idea behind both examples?

They move checkout and fulfillment logic into the shopper’s hands. Scanning, sizing, and payment become distributed across the store journey instead of centralized at a cashier line.

How do QThru and Hointer differ in the problem they solve?

QThru focuses on scan-and-pay to reduce queues. Hointer focuses on discovery and fitting-room fulfillment to remove size-hunting, then completes payment in the fitting room.

What has to be true operationally for checkout-free to work?

The system has to be reliable under load: accurate inventory, fast in-store routing, dependable scanning, and a payment flow that stays simple even when the store is busy.

What is the biggest failure mode teams underestimate?

Edge cases. Mis-scans, out-of-stocks, returns, fraud handling, and staff override paths. If exceptions are painful, the “friction-free” promise collapses at the worst moment.