Anthon Berg: The Generous Store

Anthon Berg: The Generous Store

Generosity is one of the basic elements in human happiness. The campaign cites research suggesting that only 1 in 10 people experience generosity from others. To help change that trend, Danish chocolate maker Anthon Berg opens “The Generous Store”.

For one day only, the pop-up is described as the first chocolate shop where people cannot pay with cash or card. Instead, the store provides iPads where people log in to Facebook and post a promise of a generous deed to a friend or loved one.

When generosity becomes the price tag

The twist is simple. Chocolate is not discounted. It is “priced” in actions. Your payment is a public commitment, not a transaction, and that changes how the brand message travels.

How the mechanic works

Here, the mechanic is the rule set that turns each chocolate into a reward for a promised deed. Each product comes with a defined generous deed. At checkout you choose the deed, sign in on an in-store iPad, and publish the promise to the person you are doing it for. The store does not accept money. It accepts a visible commitment that a real person can later hold you to.

In FMCG and gifting brands, turning a private intention into a light public commitment often spreads faster than any discount ever could.

Why it lands

This works because it removes the usual friction of “sharing”. People do not share an ad. They share a promise addressed to someone they care about. That makes the post feel personal, not promotional, and it gives the brand a role as the trigger for a positive moment. The one-day constraint also adds urgency. If you want in, you have to show up and do the thing.

Extractable takeaway: If you can make the customer’s “payment” a social commitment with a clear recipient, the message travels as a relationship act, not as brand content.

What the brand is really buying

The real question is whether your brand can make the act of purchase double as a socially visible promise people want to complete.

The store trades short-term revenue for reach and association. The earned effect is not just “people talked about a pop-up”. It is that the brand gets attached to a stream of personal posts that already have attention and emotional context. That is a much stronger distribution layer than asking people to like a page or share a video.

What FMCG and gifting brands can steal

  • Use a non-monetary currency that matches your brand. Here the currency is generosity, not points.
  • Make the action specific. Vague kindness does not travel. Concrete deeds do.
  • Design for a real recipient. A named person increases follow-through and keeps it human.
  • Keep the steps brutally simple. Choice, login, post. No extra hoops.
  • Limit the window. Scarcity turns a nice idea into an appointment.

A few fast answers before you act

What makes this “social commerce” rather than a normal pop-up?

The checkout is a social action. The “payment” is a posted commitment to another person, which creates distribution inside an existing network.

Why is the Facebook post essential to the idea?

It turns intent into accountability. The promise is visible to the recipient and friends, which increases the chance of follow-through and gives the campaign its reach.

What is the main risk with a “good deeds as currency” mechanic?

If it feels forced or performative, people will reject it. The deeds must feel genuinely generous and culturally natural for the audience.

How would you adapt this if you cannot use Facebook or logins?

Keep the structure and change the channel. The key is a lightweight commitment addressed to a real person, made in a way that is easy to share and later remember.

What should you measure beyond views?

Track footfall during the activation, earned mentions, the volume of public pledges, and any lift in brand association with generosity in post-campaign tracking.

Flair: Fashiontag

Flair: Fashiontag

Women are always looking for inspiration for their wardrobe and most of the time they find this inspiration by looking at other women.

This inspired agency Duval Guillaume to create a Flair Fashiontag Facebook app for Belgian women’s magazine Flair. In the app, instead of tagging people, you can tag people’s clothes or accessories and ask them where they got them.

All fashiontags are displayed in a Facebook gallery, and the best are published in the weekly edition of Flair. This way there is constant interaction between the Facebook application and the magazine itself.

Turning social curiosity into a repeatable format

The mechanism is a simple swap. Replace social tagging of people with social tagging of products. A photo becomes a shoppable question. The owner of the outfit becomes the source. The magazine becomes the curator that elevates the best finds from feed to print.

In fashion and lifestyle publishing, converting casual “where did you get that” moments into a structured loop is a practical way to keep community activity and editorial output feeding each other.

The smart move here is to treat wardrobe curiosity as a content engine, not as a side effect of social chatter. The real question is how to turn that curiosity into a repeatable loop that helps readers in the moment and gives the magazine something worth curating.

Why it lands

This works because it formalizes a behavior that already exists. People already look at outfits, notice details, and ask friends for sources. Fashiontag simply gives that behavior a native interface and a public gallery, then adds a prestige layer by featuring the best tags in the weekly magazine.

Extractable takeaway: If your audience already asks each other for product sources, build a lightweight format that captures those questions in the moment and rewards the best contributions with visible amplification.

What to steal from Fashiontag

  • Swap the object of attention: tag the item, not the person, when product discovery is the real intent.
  • Close the loop with curation: a gallery is useful. Editorial selection makes it aspirational.
  • Make participation low-friction: one tag, one question, one shareable output.
  • Bridge channels on purpose: use print, site, and social as a single system, not separate campaigns.
  • Protect the social contract: ensure the person in the photo is comfortable with tagging and featuring, especially when content moves into a magazine.

A few fast answers before you act

What is Flair Fashiontag?

It is a Facebook app for Flair magazine that lets users tag clothes or accessories in photos and ask where those items were purchased.

What makes it different from normal photo tagging?

Normal tagging identifies people. Fashiontag identifies items. It turns fashion curiosity into a structured question-and-answer interaction.

How does the magazine benefit from the Facebook app?

The app creates a steady flow of wardrobe inspiration and real questions from readers. The magazine then curates and publishes the best tags, which reinforces participation.

Why is this a strong community mechanic?

Because it rewards helpfulness. People contribute sources and recommendations, and the gallery plus print selection turns that help into recognition.

What is the biggest risk in this format?

Consent and comfort. Tagging items in someone’s photo can feel intrusive if the person did not opt in, especially if content can be featured publicly in print.