Pepsi Refresh: Monthly Grants for Ideas

Pepsi wants to make the world a better place and so it has up to $1.3 million in Refresh grants to give out every month, ranging from $5,000 through to $250,000.

The social investment campaign can be seen online at www.refresheverything.com, and is being presented as Pepsi’s alternative to spending on television advertising at the Super Bowl this year.

From January 13, US residents can submit an idea online, choosing categories of health, arts and culture, food and shelter, the planet, neighborhoods, and education.

From February 1, 2010, visitors to the site will be able to vote on ideas, with the first 32 awards being announced on March 1.

The clever part is the trade

The headline here is not just the money. It is the positioning. The real question is whether you can trade a single paid burst for a repeatable participation loop without losing clarity or trust. Pepsi is framing this as an alternative to a single high-cost burst of attention, and shifting that investment into a participatory program where people submit, rally support, and vote.

Why this format can generate momentum

It works because the format creates a loop people can re-enter. Each month resets urgency, gives participants a clear job to do, and turns support-building into something visible.

Extractable takeaway: If you want participation to create reach, make recruiting support effortless and make the cycle easy to repeat.

  • A clear incentive. Monthly grants create repeated urgency, not a one-off moment.
  • Built-in categories. Health, arts, food and shelter, the planet, neighborhoods, and education make participation easy to understand.
  • Voting creates distribution. If your idea needs votes, you recruit your network. That recruitment becomes the media.

In large-scale brand purpose programs, participation grows when funding, voting, and sharing are designed as a repeatable cycle rather than a one-off moment.

What to watch if you run campaigns like this

  1. Transparency. People will want to understand how ideas are evaluated and funded.
  2. Participation fatigue. Monthly cycles help, but the experience has to stay simple to repeat.
  3. Proof of impact. The long-term credibility comes from showing what the funded ideas actually achieved.

What to steal from Pepsi Refresh

  • Make the trade explicit. Position the program as the alternative to a single high-cost attention burst.
  • Design for repeat participation. Use a simple monthly rhythm, clear categories, and a predictable submit-and-vote flow.
  • Let supporters do the distribution. Require votes so participants recruit their networks, and that recruitment becomes the media.

A few fast answers before you act

What is the Pepsi Refresh Project?

It is a social investment program where Pepsi offers monthly “Refresh grants” and invites people to submit community ideas and rally votes to get them funded.

How much funding is available?

Up to $1.3 million in grants per month, with awards ranging from $5,000 to $250,000.

When can people submit and vote?

From January 13, US residents can submit ideas. From February 1, 2010, visitors can vote, with the first 32 awards announced on March 1.

What categories can ideas be submitted under?

Health, arts and culture, food and shelter, the planet, neighborhoods, and education.

What is the strategic alternative being positioned here?

Pepsi is presenting the program as an alternative to spending on television advertising during the Super Bowl, shifting that spend into a participatory grant platform.

Cesviamo: The Condom Mob

Cesviamo is an Italian social network created by CESVI, a non-profit organization, and this campaign is built to do three things at once. Increase awareness of the site. Explain how the social network works by turning fundraising into “funraising”. Here, “funraising” means making participation itself part of the fundraising appeal. And make people, especially students, more conscious about AIDS.

The execution is the “Condom Mob”. A large, public stunt where 100 young people enter a giant condom as a highly visible symbol against AIDS. The post reports that participation exceeded expectations, reaching 223 people in the condom in one case and 230 in another.

How the stunt acts as a product demo for the network

The mechanic is designed to be understandable at a glance, then extend into the platform. The “mob” delivers immediate attention, while the narrative around funraising and participation cues the idea of joining, sharing, and building momentum through the social network itself. Because the stunt is legible in seconds and maps directly to joining and sharing, it works as both attention device and product demo for the network.

In European nonprofit and cause-led communication, a single, highly legible public action can cut through faster than awareness copy, because it creates a shareable proof moment that people feel compelled to talk about.

Why it lands

It uses contrast and scale to force attention. A condom is already a charged object. Making it oversized and public turns it into a conversation starter, which helps the AIDS message travel beyond the people who were physically present. The “mob” format also frames the topic as collective responsibility, not private embarrassment.

Extractable takeaway: If you need awareness plus platform adoption, choose one symbol that is instantly readable, then design the stunt so the audience’s next step naturally points back to joining and participating in your owned experience.

What CESVI is really trying to achieve

The business intent is behavioral. The real question is whether a public spectacle can turn student attention into repeat participation inside the network. Normalize discussion. Pull students into the cause. And position Cesviamo as a place where participation is easy, social, and measurable. For cause campaigns like this, spectacle is only useful when it feeds a repeatable participation path. The stunt is the ignition. The platform is where attention can be converted into repeat involvement.

What to steal for your own cause campaign

  • Make the symbol unavoidable. Choose one visual that communicates the issue without explanation.
  • Design for “I have to tell someone”. If the moment creates a story people can repeat in one sentence, distribution follows.
  • Connect spectacle to a next step. Awareness without an action path leaks value. Point clearly to how to join, donate, or participate.
  • Measure participation, not just reach. Headcount and involvement are stronger proof than impressions for cause work.

A few fast answers before you act

What is the core idea of the Condom Mob?

A large, public stunt where young people enter a giant condom to spark AIDS awareness and drive attention back to CESVI’s Cesviamo network.

Why does “funraising” matter in this context?

It reframes giving and participation as something people do together, making it easier to recruit students and first-time supporters.

What makes the symbol effective?

It is instantly recognizable and directly tied to prevention. That directness reduces the need for explanation and increases talk value.

How should the next step be designed?

The stunt should hand people to one obvious action, such as joining, donating, or participating, so attention does not dissipate after the moment passes.

What is the main risk with a stunt like this?

If the spectacle overwhelms the cause, people remember the shock but miss the message. The narrative and next step must stay explicit and repeated.