The Day Shazam Forgot

Alzheimer’s Research UK partners with Shazam and does something deliberately uncomfortable. It gives the app the symptoms of Alzheimer’s. You use Shazam as you normally would, but the experience starts to break in ways that mirror memory loss. It is a hard-hitting way to feel, in a small moment, what daily struggle can look like.

The insight behind the campaign is about who needs to be reached. Most people associate Alzheimer’s with late life, but the disease can affect people as young as 40. The post cites over 40,000 people under 65 living with dementia in the UK.

The point is education through friction

This does not try to persuade with claims or statistics alone. It turns education into a lived interaction. Shazam is familiar and fast. Making it unreliable becomes the message.

The real question is how to make a misunderstood condition felt in a way that stays with people after the interaction ends.

This is a strong use of product behaviour because the disruption teaches rather than distracts. The intent here is public education, not app utility.

Why the Shazam choice is strategic

Shazam already sits in a high-frequency behaviour loop. By behaviour loop, this means a repeated habit people perform in real-life moments with very little effort or planning. That makes it a powerful carrier for a message about everyday disruption, because it arrives inside everyday life rather than as a separate awareness film.

Extractable takeaway: If you want people to understand a condition that is easy to distance or abstract away, place the message inside a familiar action so the disruption explains the reality better than a claim alone.

In consumer-facing digital experiences, familiar habits are often the best place to make a hard message land because the contrast is felt immediately.

What to take from this if you build digital experiences

  • Simulate a small part of the experience, not just the outcome, when the condition itself is hard to explain.
  • Put the message inside a familiar behaviour, so the contrast is instantly felt.
  • Use disruption sparingly and intentionally, so the discomfort has a purpose and does not turn into irritation.

A few fast answers before you act

What is “The Day Shazam Forgot”?

A Shazam partnership campaign that simulates Alzheimer’s symptoms to give users a direct, hard-hitting insight into memory loss.

Who is the campaign trying to educate?

A younger audience that may assume Alzheimer’s only affects people in late life.

What key fact reframes the audience assumption?

The disease can affect people as young as 40. The post cites over 40,000 people under 65 living with dementia in the UK.

What is the core creative technique?

Turning a familiar app experience into a controlled failure state, so the message is felt rather than only read.

Why use Shazam instead of a separate awareness film?

Because Shazam already lives inside everyday moments, the disruption arrives where memory lapses would feel personally relevant rather than abstract.

Plan: The Erasable Billboard for Girls’ Education

A large illustrated billboard appears in a busy city square. People donate, receive a simple eraser, and start rubbing away the artwork. As the top layer disappears, a second illustration is revealed underneath, shifting the story from girls working to girls going to school.

Plan has reported that tens of millions of girls worldwide are pushed into work instead of education, while in many less privileged countries boys are more likely to get access to schooling. To spark action, Plan and CLM BBDO created an erasable billboard with an illustration designed to be removed to reveal another illustration underneath. The billboard ran in central locations in Paris and Berlin. Passers-by were invited to donate in exchange for an eraser, then use it to change what the billboard showed.

Why the “erasable” mechanic is so strong

The mechanism does two jobs at once. It raises money, and it makes the issue understandable without explanation. The before-and-after is literal. Work disappears. School appears. The donor is not only informed. The donor performs the change. Cause-led campaigns should treat participation as the message, not a bonus layer.

Extractable takeaway: When the donor completes the transformation with their hands, the message becomes a memory and the donation feels consequential.

Definition-tightening: the eraser is not a gimmick. It is the interface, meaning the simple physical tool that gives the donor viewer control over the story. Because the act of erasing creates ownership, it makes someone more likely to donate, talk about it, and remember it.

In social-impact fundraising, participatory outdoor media can turn a small donation into a visible act of change that people feel in their hands.

The real question is whether your donation ask feels like participation or just passive sympathy.

What Plan is really buying

This is a public proof of participation. Instead of asking people to “care” in private, it makes caring visible, social, and shared. Every person who erases becomes a live endorsement that the issue matters enough to stop and act.

Steal this pattern: make giving tactile

  • Make the transformation physical. A tangible before-and-after beats a poster full of statistics.
  • Use the donation as the trigger. The action should only unlock after contribution, not before it.
  • Let participation create the content. The billboard changes because people change it.
  • Design for bystanders. Watching others erase is part of the persuasion.

A few fast answers before you act

What is the “Erasable Billboard” idea?

An illustrated billboard designed to be physically erased. Donors receive an eraser and reveal a second image underneath, shifting the story from girls working to girls going to school.

Why exchange a donation for an eraser?

Because it turns giving into an action. The eraser is a simple reward, but more importantly it is the tool that lets the donor create the transformation themselves.

What makes this more effective than a standard charity billboard?

It is participatory and observable. The public sees the billboard changing in real time, which builds social proof and makes the issue easier to grasp.

What is the main emotional lever?

Viewer control. The donor does not only learn about the problem. The donor performs a symbolic solution in front of others.

What is the biggest execution risk?

If the transformation is not instantly readable, people will not engage. The before-and-after needs to be obvious from a distance and satisfying up close.

ActionAid: Donate Your Profile

ActionAid is an organisation committed to many projects, like fighting hunger and poverty. But in Italy it is known primarily for sponsoring children.

To communicate the broader work of ActionAid with a small media and production budget, DLV BBDO created “Donate Your Profile”. Participants donated their Facebook and Twitter profile pictures so that awareness could be generated for the stories of people ActionAid helped.

How “Donate Your Profile” worked

The mechanism is a simple identity swap. People hand over the most visible square in their social presence. Their profile photo. In return, they display a campaign image tied to a real person’s story, so every comment, like, and share carries that story into everyday social traffic.

Support from Radio 105, Radio Deejay, La Stampa, Marc Marquez and other Italian celebrities and brands helps normalise the behaviour. Once well-known accounts participate, the “donate your picture” action looks safe, easy, and socially endorsed.

In Italian cause marketing, borrowing social identity can outperform paid media when budgets are tight, because it turns personal networks into distribution.

The real question is how to turn a low-budget act of support into something people carry through their normal social behaviour.

Why the profile swap spreads

This works because it converts passive support into a visible, persistent signal. A profile picture is not a post that disappears in a feed. It is a durable badge that travels wherever you show up online, and it prompts questions that naturally lead to explanation and sharing.

Extractable takeaway: If you need earned reach without heavy spend, move the call to action from “share a post” to “change a default”. When people change a default surface, the campaign rides along with their normal behaviour.

The reported impact

The project was described as becoming the 5th most trending topic on Twitter and generating over 79 million media impressions, with more people joining in as the support network grew.

What to borrow from the profile-swap pattern

  • Pick a high-frequency surface. Defaults like profile photos travel more than one-off posts.
  • Make the action reversible. People participate faster when the commitment feels temporary.
  • Seed with credible partners. Media brands and recognisable faces reduce hesitation.
  • Turn participation into a conversation starter. The best mechanics invite questions, not just clicks.

A few fast answers before you act

What is “Donate Your Profile”?

It is a campaign where people replace their Facebook and Twitter profile pictures with a campaign image, so ActionAid stories gain awareness through everyday social interactions.

Why use profile pictures instead of posts?

A profile picture is persistent and high-visibility. It shows up repeatedly across comments and interactions, so the message travels without requiring constant re-posting.

How did the campaign scale beyond early participants?

Reportedly through support from media brands and celebrities, which makes the behaviour feel normal and increases follow-on participation.

What results were reported?

Reported results included reaching the 5th most trending topic on Twitter and generating over 79 million media impressions.

What is the main risk with this pattern?

Trust. If people are unclear about what is being changed, for how long, and what they are authorising, participation drops. The exchange must be transparent and easy to undo.