Pizza Hut: Pie Tops II

Pizza Hut is the official pizza of the NCAA, a men’s basketball tournament known informally as March Madness and played each spring in the United States.

For last year’s tournament, Pizza Hut created what was billed as the world’s first shoe that ordered a pizza. Now, to celebrate their second year as the official pizza of the NCAA, Pizza Hut, Droga5 and the Shoe Surgeon launched Pie Tops II. It is a limited-edition high top shoe that not only uses your geolocation to order the current Pizza Hut deal at the press of a button, but also allows users to pause the game while they receive their delivery.

A TV ad has also been released to highlight the new pause feature of these newly relaunched Pie Top shoes.

A sneaker button that behaves like a remote

The mechanism is deliberately simple. Put a single button on the shoe. Tie it to an app. Map the press to two jobs: order, then pause. The shoe becomes a physical shortcut for a very specific March Madness moment, when people want food but do not want to miss play. That works because it removes friction at the exact moment attention is highest.

In second-screen sports viewing, the strongest interactions reduce interruption while keeping attention on the live game.

Why it lands on game day

Pie Tops II works because it converts a familiar tension into a prop. Hunger versus attention. Convenience versus FOMO. The “pause” feature turns a delivery problem into a punchline, and the shoe format makes the whole thing instantly tellable.

Extractable takeaway: If you can turn a high-frequency habit into a one-action ritual, you make the brand feel like part of the event, not just an ad around it.

The real intent behind the novelty

This is not really about footwear. The real question is how Pizza Hut earns a place inside the live ritual instead of advertising around it. It is about owning a behavior loop during March Madness. By behavior loop here, I mean a repeatable sequence of trigger, action, and reward that keeps the brand attached to the moment. Pizza ordering, deal recall, and a reason to talk about Pizza Hut in the same breath as the game. The smart move here is not the gadget but the way it turns brand utility into event behavior. Limited-edition scarcity does the rest, because it makes the product itself a piece of shareable culture.

What brands can steal from Pie Tops II

  • Pick one moment to own: design for a specific tension that happens repeatedly during an event, not for “sports fans” in general.
  • One control, two outcomes: a single action that triggers both utility and delight is more memorable than a complex feature list.
  • Make the object do the storytelling: the product should explain the campaign in one sentence, even without a logo.
  • Build viewer control into the idea: letting people keep the game in their hands makes the brand feel helpful, not interruptive.
  • Scarcity as distribution: limited runs can function like media spend when the object is inherently talkable.

A few fast answers before you act

What are Pie Tops II?

They are limited-edition Pizza Hut sneakers designed for March Madness that let you order pizza via a button press and, as described, pause the game while you wait for delivery.

What problem is this campaign solving?

It dramatizes a familiar game-day problem. People want food without missing play. The stunt turns that tension into a memorable product feature and a shareable story.

Why does the “pause” feature matter more than the pizza-ordering feature?

Ordering is convenient. Pausing is emotionally resonant because it speaks directly to FOMO during live sports. It is the twist that makes the idea travel.

Is this wearable tech or brand entertainment?

It is primarily brand entertainment packaged as a functional shortcut. The utility makes it credible. The novelty makes it worth talking about.

What is the reusable pattern for other brands?

Create a physical or tactile shortcut for a high-frequency moment. Keep the interaction to one obvious action. Then tie it to an event where people already have strong emotions and repeat behaviors.

Coca-Cola Second Screen Reinvented

You are watching a Coca-Cola TV spot in Israel. Your phone lights up. A “Gett Coca-Cola” prompt appears. You tap once. Five minutes later, a special Coca-Cola package shows up at your door: a branded cooler, two Coke bottles, and a bottle opener.

From TV spot to one-tap delivery

Turn a TV ad into a one-tap order, and make “second screen” mean immediate delivery, not just engagement. Here, “second screen” means the phone acting as the immediate action surface while the TV spot supplies the trigger.

What is actually happening on the second screen

The TV spot carries an audio trigger that a smartphone can recognize. The moment the ad plays, phones with the Gett app installed receive a push notification. The viewer swipes or taps, and the order is placed in one click.

In practice, this behaves like Shazam for commerce. Except the payoff is not identification. It is fulfillment.

Why the Gett partnership is the real unlock

The ad is only half the experience. The other half is logistics.

To make the “five minutes later” promise credible, Coca-Cola partners with Gett, a local taxi app, and during the promotion Gett dispatches thousands of vehicles packed with branded coolers across Israel, ready to deliver on demand.

In FMCG and retail campaigns, the strategic value is not the novelty of a second screen, but the ability to compress media, commerce, and fulfillment into one immediate behavior.

The real question is whether the brand can remove enough friction that attention turns into action before intent cools.

Why this feels like a reinvention of TV, not a gimmick

This is not a gimmick. It is a tighter piece of commercial design because the creative, transaction, and fulfillment layers are built to work as one system.

Extractable takeaway: When a campaign links attention, transaction, and delivery inside one continuous action, the medium stops acting like awareness-only media and starts behaving like a service.

It collapses the funnel

There is no gap between awareness and action. The moment of attention is the moment of purchase.

It turns “sampling” into a media format

The campaign is a TV impression plus product trial, delivered instantly.

It makes the second screen earn its place

Second screen ideas often stop at polls and hashtags. Here, the phone is not a companion. It is the checkout button.

The deeper point

This is what “buyable advertising” looks like when it is engineered end to end. By “buyable advertising,” this means media that lets a viewer move from exposure to transaction without leaving the moment.

The business intent is simple: remove the lag between media spend and product trial by turning broadcast attention into immediate, measurable fulfillment.

Media triggers action. Action triggers logistics. Logistics completes the brand promise while attention is still warm.

What to steal from this buyable-media model

  • Collapse the funnel deliberately: If you can connect attention to action in one gesture, the “ad” becomes the first step of the purchase flow.
  • Make the trigger earn its existence: Second screen only matters when it changes the outcome, not when it adds commentary.
  • Engineer fulfillment as part of the creative: The logistics promise is the product. Treat it like core campaign craft, not an ops afterthought.
  • Turn sampling into a format: Delivering the kit is the media unit. That is why this reads as more than a shoppable banner.
  • Protect trust explicitly: Any “listening” mechanic needs clear permissioning and transparency, or the whole experience flips from magic to creepy.

A few fast answers before you act

What does the TV ad do that is different?

It uses an audio trigger so phones can recognize the ad and prompt a “Gett Coca-Cola” order on the second screen.

Do viewers need anything installed for this to work?

Yes. The flow depends on the Gett app, since the notification and one-tap order happens inside Gett.

How does it deliver so fast?

Gett uses its taxi network as a delivery fleet, with cars preloaded with the cooler kits during the promotion.

Why is this more powerful than a “second screen” hashtag?

Because the second screen is not commentary. It is conversion plus fulfillment.

What is the main risk brands must manage?

User trust. Any experience that “listens” for triggers must be transparent and permissioned, or it will feel creepy, even if the mechanics work.

Durex UK: Dual Screen Ads

When the “real” ad plays on your second screen

People watch TV with a phone in hand. Durex UK used that habit to turn a standard broadcast spot into an interactive experience. Here, the “second screen” is the phone or tablet used alongside the main TV or computer screen.

Last year, Durex UK created a new way for viewers to interact with its TV ad. Viewers who used the Durex Explore mobile app while watching the ad on their TV or computer got a steamy alternative on their second screen.

How the dual-screen mechanic worked

The mechanism was straightforward. The broadcast spot acted as the trigger, and the Durex Explore app delivered an alternative experience on the viewer’s phone or tablet.

That split matters. The TV carried the mainstream version. The second screen carried the more private, more personal layer, where the viewer could engage without turning the living room into a shared moment.

In UK brand communications, second-screen behavior is already the norm.

The real question is whether you can separate a public broadcast layer from a private opt-in layer without breaking the story.

Why it lands in real viewing contexts

This works because it respects how people actually consume media.

Extractable takeaway: If your message has a public-safe version and a private version, keep the broadcast layer mainstream and let the personal device deliver the private layer only after an explicit opt-in.

Phones are personal. TV is social. By moving the steamy content to the second screen, Durex created a “permissioned” experience. By “permissioned,” I mean nothing intimate appears unless the viewer explicitly chooses it, on their own device. Because the broadcast spot only triggers the moment and the app carries the alternative layer, the viewer can opt in privately without turning a shared room into a shared moment.

It also rewards attention. Instead of asking viewers to tolerate an ad, it gives them a reason to participate.

The business intent behind extending TV and radio through an app

The intent is to convert passive reach into active engagement, while keeping the broadcast execution broadly acceptable. This is a smart pattern when you need mass reach but the payoff has to stay private.

Then, on Valentine’s Day this year, Durex UK repeated the same idea via radio. They released a steamy radio spot that also used the Durex Explore app to provide listeners with a similar steamy video experience on their smartphone or tablet.

That is the strategic move. One app. Multiple channels. A consistent interaction model that travels across TV, computer viewing, radio, and mobile.

Second-screen tactics you can reuse

  • Use the second screen for the private layer. Put the content that needs discretion on the personal device.
  • Make participation optional and clear. The viewer should feel in control of switching modes.
  • Design one mechanic that scales across channels. If the app is the interface, TV and radio can both become entry points.
  • Reward attention with a different experience. The second-screen payoff must feel meaningfully distinct from the broadcast spot.

A few fast answers before you act

What did Durex UK do with the Explore app?

They used it to deliver an alternative, steamy second-screen experience for viewers watching a TV ad, and later for listeners hearing a radio spot.

What is the core mechanism?

A broadcast ad acts as the trigger. The mobile app provides the alternative content on a phone or tablet.

Why is second screen a good fit for this category?

Because it keeps intimate content on a personal device, while the broadcast remains suitable for shared environments.

What business goal does this support?

Turning broadcast reach into measurable engagement and creating a repeatable interaction layer that works across channels.

What is the main takeaway for marketers?

If your message has a “public” and “private” version, broadcast the public layer and let the second screen deliver the private layer by choice.