Augmented toys and games from Toy Fair 2013

A Barbie vanity frame turns an iPad into a make-up mirror, then “virtual lipstick” stays aligned to a moving face in real time. That single mechanic explains why Toy Fair in New York suddenly feels like a preview of hybrid play, where the screen becomes a window and the physical object remains the star.

Most of the standout demos share the same blueprint. A physical toy, book, or playset provides the anchor. The iPad app provides the content layer. The camera feed stitches the two together so kids can touch, move, build, and explore while the digital layer reacts.

In consumer product innovation, the most scalable mixed reality experiences treat the device as a lens onto the room, not the destination.

Augmented reality (AR) toys are physical products that use a phone or tablet camera to overlay digital characters, effects, or instructions onto the real-world toy. The toy stays central. The app adds feedback, rules, and story without replacing hands-on play.

Why these “phygital” toys land

Parents get a familiar promise. Less passive viewing and more active play. Kids get something that feels like magic because it responds to the real world, not just taps on glass.

From a design perspective, the winning pattern is low-friction onboarding and immediate payoff. Put the device in the frame, scan the page, point at the ball, then something delightful happens fast.

The Toy Fair shortlist

Barbie Digital Makeover Mirror

Lets kids try out make up while avoiding all the mess. The iPad camera tracks a face in real time so the “makeover” sticks as the head moves.

Mattel Disney Princess Ultimate Dream Castle

Billed as a first mass-market doll house to support augmented reality, with app-triggered activities layered onto the physical rooms.

Popar 3D Books

A line of children’s books that use AR to make pages “come alive” with virtual 3D objects and animations that appear to pop off the paper.

Sphero Ball and Sharky the Beaver

Billed as the first app ever to let you take a virtual 3D character for a walk around your house. The physical ball becomes the anchor for an on-screen creature you “walk” around the room.

Imaginext Apptivity Fortress

Combines playset and app play in one, with the iPad physically inserted into the fortress so the device becomes part of the toy and the adventures unfold around it.

NeuroSky

Brain waves control furry ears.

Lego Mindstorms EV3

User-created robots that can be controlled by various sensors and smartphones.

Cubelets

Magnetic blocks that snap together to make an endless variety of robots with no programming and no wires. The “logic” is in how you combine the cubes.

Sifteo Cubes

A magical interactive game system built on the timeless play patterns of LEGO, building blocks, and domino tiles, but with screens and sensors inside each cube.

What to steal if you are designing interactive products

  • Make the physical object the controller. When hands are busy, attention stays in the room.
  • Design for instant delight. The first 10 seconds should prove the concept without instructions.
  • Use the camera as a sensor. Anchors, markers, and recognizable shapes are a simple bridge between atoms and pixels.
  • Plan for replay. New levels, new stories, and collectible content keep the “magic” from wearing off after day one.

A few fast answers before you act

What is an AR toy in simple terms?

An AR toy is a physical toy, book, or playset that becomes more interactive when viewed through a phone or tablet. The camera feed shows the real object, and the app overlays digital characters, effects, or instructions on top.

Do these experiences replace “screen time”?

Not really. They redirect it. The screen becomes a lens onto physical play, so the child is moving, building, and exploring while the digital layer reacts.

What is the most repeatable pattern across the examples?

A physical anchor plus an app-based content layer. The physical piece gives tactile play and structure. The app provides animation, rules, progression, and feedback.

What should a brand learn from this wave of toy innovation?

Interactivity scales when the physical product is useful on its own, and the digital layer adds meaning rather than acting as a required destination. The best experiences feel like an upgrade, not a dependency.

What is a common failure mode for “phygital” concepts?

Too much setup and too little payoff. If the experience needs long instructions, special lighting, or frequent recalibration, the magic breaks fast and replay drops.

VW Polo Principle: Crowdsourced 3D Prints

Volkswagen last year launched “The Polo Principle” ad campaign to convey the message that high-end innovations were now available to Polo drivers.

Then, to democratize the innovation process, they allowed people to actually design their very own 3D Volkswagen mock ups. The top 40 designs were chosen by a panel of judges and then put on display in Copenhagen, with the entrants receiving their (mini) 3D printed Volkswagens in the mail.

From innovation message to innovation participation

The mechanism is a neat escalation. The campaign starts with a claim: premium innovation is no longer reserved for premium models. Then it turns that claim into an action: if innovation is being “democratised,” people should be able to shape it. A 3D design tool becomes the interface for participation.

Instead of asking audiences to agree with the brand message, Volkswagen invites them to contribute to it, visually and playfully.

In co-creation campaigns, participation becomes persuasion when people can make something that physically proves the brand promise.

Why it lands: ownership beats persuasion

This works because creating something triggers a different level of engagement than watching something. Designing a mock up requires time, intent, and taste. Once you invest that effort, you become emotionally tied to the campaign. And when your design is selected, the brand is no longer a distant manufacturer. It is a platform that amplified you.

The Copenhagen display adds a public payoff. It moves the work out of the browser and into a real space, which signals seriousness and status.

The intent: make “accessible innovation” feel real

The business intent is to attach innovation to the Polo brand without sounding like advertising. User-generated designs create social proof. The 3D printed mini cars make the campaign tangible. “Innovation is available to you” becomes “here is something you made, and here is a physical object that proves it.”

What to steal from this approach

  • Turn a message into a mechanism. If you claim democracy, build a democratic action people can take.
  • Reward with something physical. A mailed 3D print is a memorable artefact, not a forgettable badge.
  • Curate publicly. Exhibiting the top designs creates status and raises the perceived value of participation.
  • Use judges plus community. A panel can signal craft and quality, not just popularity.
  • Design for shareability. People naturally share what they created, especially when it looks good.

For more examples on brands using 3D printing click here.


A few fast answers before you act

What was the core idea behind the Polo Principle extension?

To move from talking about “innovation for everyone” to letting people participate by designing their own 3D Volkswagen mock ups.

Why add 3D printing to a campaign?

It creates a physical proof point. A printed mini model makes the experience feel real, personal, and worth keeping.

What role did the Copenhagen display play?

It gave public status to the best designs and signalled that the brand took the contributions seriously, beyond a digital stunt.

Is co-creation mainly an awareness play?

It can drive awareness, but its deeper value is emotional ownership. People remember what they helped create.

What is the main takeaway for brands claiming “democratisation”?

If you want the message to stick, build a mechanism that lets people experience the claim directly, and reward participation in a tangible way.

AR in 2013: Three Retail-Ready Examples

Augmented Reality in 2013: when the real world becomes the interface

With smartphones and tablets becoming part of our everyday life, we also see more augmented reality apps mixing the virtual and the real world in 2013. Here are some examples from ARworks that recently caught my eye.

Audi Singapore Showroom app

For the opening of their biggest showroom in South-East Asia, Audi created AR experiences that allowed visitors to fly around the showroom building without actually boarding a plane, or drive the Audi R18 race car around Singapore at full speed without the risk of getting a ticket. What’s more, they even allowed visitors to personalize their individual license plates and then take photos with the car.

Dakar race in a shopping mall

A real Dakar desert racecourse was built for the new Opel Mokka on a 4mtrs long table that was placed in a shopping mall. Visitors could use the provided iPads to race against time and each other. The results were then shared on Facebook, and the weekly and overall winners received various prizes.

Christmas Ornament Sling

Deutsche Telekom, for their Christmas promotion, developed an iPad app where visitors could throw virtual Christmas ornaments containing their personal message onto a huge Christmas tree erected in a mall. A successful hit to one of the real ornaments on the tree lit it up through an integrated server application.

The pattern across all three: AR turns “watching” into doing

None of these examples treat AR as a gimmick. Each one uses the device as a bridge between curiosity and action. You explore a building. You race a course. You aim a message at a real tree. The screen stops being a place to consume. It becomes a tool to participate.

In retail and shopper environments, augmented reality works best when it turns a physical setup into a simple, repeatable action loop for the visitor.

Why retail is the natural habitat for AR

Retail already has the ingredients. Footfall, dwell time, and physical objects that can anchor the experience. AR simply adds a layer of viewer control. The visitor decides where to look, what to try, and what to share.

What’s really being built here

These are not “apps.” They are engagement machines. Each one creates a clear reason to interact, a clear reward for completing the action, and a clear path to share or repeat. That is how you turn novelty into behavior.

What to steal for your next AR build

  • Anchor the experience to a physical object people can gather around. A showroom, a tabletop course, a tree.
  • Give the visitor a simple verb. Fly, drive, race, sling. Actions beat features.
  • Design a payoff. A photo, a score, a lit ornament. Make the outcome tangible.
  • Make sharing a natural by-product of the activity, not a forced button at the end.

A few fast answers before you act

What makes these 2013 AR examples feel “ready” for real audiences?

They are built around clear actions and clear rewards. The device is used to do something in the physical environment, not just view an overlay.

Which devices are central to these activations?

Tablets and phones. The examples explicitly reference iPads and handheld devices as the delivery mechanism for the AR interaction.

What role does sharing play in these concepts?

Sharing is tied to the activity. Photos with the car, results shared on Facebook, and personal messages sent as virtual ornaments.

What is the common mechanic across the three examples?

Using the camera-enabled device as a controller that links a real-world setup to a virtual experience, giving the viewer control over exploration and interaction.