Coca-Cola: Santa’s Forgotten Letters

When childhood letters get answered years later

The city of Santa Claus is situated in the state of Indiana, USA. The museum in the city brings together different objects related to Santa Claus and has long received letters from people around the world, described as doing so for more than 70 years.

Coca-Cola with its ad agency Ogilvy Brazil selected 75 forgotten letters, meaning letters written to Santa as children that sat unanswered for years, and set out on an impossible task to find the writers and give them exactly what they asked for. The result was a touching movie that reinforces the magic of Christmas.

The impossible brief behind the film

The mechanism is straightforward and brutal in effort. Find a place where old letters to Santa were kept. Read through decades of messages that never got a reply. Select a small set of letters. Then track down the original writers and recreate the exact gifts they once requested.

In global FMCG holiday marketing, the fastest route to belief is to make generosity observable in the real world, not just promised in a tagline.

Santa’s Forgotten Letters is a Coca-Cola Christmas campaign by Ogilvy Brazil that turns archival letters into real deliveries, using the act of fulfilment as the proof of the story.

Why it lands: belief becomes physical

This works because it reverses the usual Christmas-ad formula. Instead of asking the audience to feel something while watching a film, it shows a real-world action first. The emotion is earned by the logistics.

Extractable takeaway: If you want “magic” to read as real, put the proof in the world first, then let the film simply document the effort.

The letters also do the writing for the brand. Each request is specific, personal, and time-stamped by childhood. That specificity makes the surprise feel less like marketing and more like closure.

The business intent hiding inside the sentiment

Coca-Cola is reinforcing a familiar role in the season. It wants to be the brand that protects the “magic” adults quietly miss, and it does that by staging a story people retell without needing to mention product features.

The real question is whether you can prove the sentiment with a concrete act, not just narrate it.

Done well, this is the right kind of sentiment-led brand work because it earns emotion through effort the audience can verify.

This is brand meaning built through a single, high-signal act that generates a long tail of earned conversation.

Steal this structure for earned emotion

  • Start with an artifact, not an insight. Real letters, real handwriting, real specificity.
  • Make the work visible. Show the searching, the tracking, the making, the delivery.
  • Let the recipients carry the truth. The reactions are the credibility layer.
  • Limit the scope to protect authenticity. A small number of deliveries can feel more believable than a mass stunt.

A few fast answers before you act

What is Coca-Cola’s Santa’s Forgotten Letters campaign?

It is a Christmas film built around a real-world fulfilment stunt. Coca-Cola and Ogilvy Brazil selected 75 old letters to Santa from Santa Claus, Indiana, tracked down the writers, and delivered the gifts they once asked for.

Where did the letters come from?

The letters were kept in Santa Claus, Indiana, where a local Santa-related museum had reportedly received letters for decades.

What is the mechanism, step by step?

Locate an archive of unanswered letters. Select a small set. Identify the original writers years later. Recreate the exact requested gifts. Deliver them, and film the search and the moment of fulfilment.

Why does the “old letters” device work so well?

Because it carries built-in specificity and credibility. A handwritten childhood request feels personal and time-stamped, so the fulfilment reads as earned rather than manufactured.

What should brands learn from this execution?

If you want belief, let the action do the persuading. Make the work visible. Keep the claim simple. Let real reactions carry the credibility.

What is the main risk with this kind of sentiment-led work?

If the fulfilment feels staged, scaled too broadly, or too polished, it can lose authenticity. Limiting scope and showing real effort helps protect trust.

Pepsi Refresh: Monthly Grants for Ideas

Pepsi wants to make the world a better place and so it has up to $1.3 million in Refresh grants to give out every month, ranging from $5,000 through to $250,000.

The social investment campaign can be seen online at www.refresheverything.com, and is being presented as Pepsi’s alternative to spending on television advertising at the Super Bowl this year.

From January 13, US residents can submit an idea online, choosing categories of health, arts and culture, food and shelter, the planet, neighborhoods, and education.

From February 1, 2010, visitors to the site will be able to vote on ideas, with the first 32 awards being announced on March 1.

The clever part is the trade

The headline here is not just the money. It is the positioning. The real question is whether you can trade a single paid burst for a repeatable participation loop without losing clarity or trust. Pepsi is framing this as an alternative to a single high-cost burst of attention, and shifting that investment into a participatory program where people submit, rally support, and vote.

Why this format can generate momentum

It works because the format creates a loop people can re-enter. Each month resets urgency, gives participants a clear job to do, and turns support-building into something visible.

Extractable takeaway: If you want participation to create reach, make recruiting support effortless and make the cycle easy to repeat.

  • A clear incentive. Monthly grants create repeated urgency, not a one-off moment.
  • Built-in categories. Health, arts, food and shelter, the planet, neighborhoods, and education make participation easy to understand.
  • Voting creates distribution. If your idea needs votes, you recruit your network. That recruitment becomes the media.

In large-scale brand purpose programs, participation grows when funding, voting, and sharing are designed as a repeatable cycle rather than a one-off moment.

What to watch if you run campaigns like this

  1. Transparency. People will want to understand how ideas are evaluated and funded.
  2. Participation fatigue. Monthly cycles help, but the experience has to stay simple to repeat.
  3. Proof of impact. The long-term credibility comes from showing what the funded ideas actually achieved.

What to steal from Pepsi Refresh

  • Make the trade explicit. Position the program as the alternative to a single high-cost attention burst.
  • Design for repeat participation. Use a simple monthly rhythm, clear categories, and a predictable submit-and-vote flow.
  • Let supporters do the distribution. Require votes so participants recruit their networks, and that recruitment becomes the media.

A few fast answers before you act

What is the Pepsi Refresh Project?

It is a social investment program where Pepsi offers monthly “Refresh grants” and invites people to submit community ideas and rally votes to get them funded.

How much funding is available?

Up to $1.3 million in grants per month, with awards ranging from $5,000 to $250,000.

When can people submit and vote?

From January 13, US residents can submit ideas. From February 1, 2010, visitors can vote, with the first 32 awards announced on March 1.

What categories can ideas be submitted under?

Health, arts and culture, food and shelter, the planet, neighborhoods, and education.

What is the strategic alternative being positioned here?

Pepsi is presenting the program as an alternative to spending on television advertising during the Super Bowl, shifting that spend into a participatory grant platform.