Tag: Digital Campaigns

Vodafone Pixel Hunt

To promote the new Vodafone LG Optimus Windows 7 phone with 5 Megapixel camera, German ad agency Jung von Matt/Alster launched a website where the users had to search for the winning pixels in a picture of 5 millions pixels. There were one hundred winning pixels and each one of the winning pixels contained a brand new LG Optimus Windows 7 phone with 5 Megapixel camera.

In under a month, the entire 5 Million Pixels were clicked out by over 300,000 visitors (pixel by pixel). Thereby making this a great example of how a simple engagement campaign can generate the best results.

VGT: Fur iAd that bleeds when you swipe

VGT (an association combating animal factories), working with Austrian agency Demner, Merlicek & Bergmann, created an iAd for the iPad edition of DATUM magazine.

The iAd shows a young woman wearing a fur coat. When the iPad user tries to continue browsing with the familiar finger-wipe movement, each swipe leaves a blood stain on the fur. The more you try, the more blood appears, turning a simple “next page” gesture into the message.

In tablet-first media environments, gesture-based interactivity can turn a standard placement into a moral confrontation.

A navigation gesture that becomes the accusation

The clever part is that nothing “extra” is required from the user. No quiz. No mini game. No new behaviour. The iAd hijacks the most natural behaviour on the device. Swiping to move on. That is why it feels so sticky. The ad does not ask for attention. It punishes avoidance.

Standalone takeaway: The strongest tablet interactions do not add features. They repurpose native gestures so the message is felt in the hand, not just read on the screen.

The mechanism: friction by design

Most advertising tries to reduce friction. This does the opposite. It introduces deliberate friction at the exact moment the audience normally exits. That choice forces a small pause, and that pause is where the ethical point lands.

In coverage and case listings, the execution is framed under the line “Blood sticks to every genuine fur,” with the swipe mechanic visualising “you can’t keep your hands clean.”

Why it lands even if you dislike shock tactics

This is not shock for spectacle. It is shock attached to an action the viewer chooses. You create the stains. That’s what makes the experience uncomfortable in a more personal way than a static image could.

It also matches the medium. The iPad is intimate. It’s held close. When a message uses touch to implicate the user, it feels harder to dismiss than a poster or a pre-roll.

What to steal for your own iPad and tablet units

  • Exploit a native gesture. Swipe, pinch, tap, drag. If the gesture is already habitual, the learning curve disappears.
  • Make the interaction mean something. The response should be the argument, not just a visual flourish.
  • Use friction sparingly and intentionally. Only add resistance when the resistance is the point.
  • Design for instant comprehension. The first swipe should explain the whole idea.
  • Earn the discomfort. If you push people emotionally, the payoff must be clarity, not confusion.

A few fast answers before you act

What is the VGT iAd concept in one sentence?

An iPad iAd that prevents an easy page swipe by leaving blood stains on a fur coat every time you try to move on.

Why use the swipe gesture instead of a video or a static image?

Because swiping is an action the user performs. When the consequence appears immediately, the viewer feels involved rather than merely informed.

Is this an example of “interactive storytelling” or “interactive persuasion”?

Both. The story is minimal, but the persuasion is embodied. The interaction itself carries the moral logic.

When does this kind of tactic backfire?

When the shock feels disconnected from the cause, when the friction blocks people without a clear point, or when the execution reads as manipulation rather than meaning.

What is the simplest way to apply this pattern ethically?

Use a familiar gesture, create an immediate consequence tied to the message, and ensure the user can still exit once the point is delivered.

Yellow Pages: Location Based Banner

Here is the next generation of interactive web banners. Tel Aviv agency Shalmor Avnon Amichay/Y&R promoted the Yellow Pages augmented reality location-based app by creating a banner that does the same thing.

The banner opens your webcam and lets you see the businesses around you. Wave your hand to switch between businesses. Click a business to jump straight to its Yellow Pages listing.

A banner that behaves like the product

The clever part is that this is not “interactive” for decoration. It is a working demo of the core value proposition. If the app helps you find what is near you, the banner proves that promise immediately, inside the placement, without asking you to imagine anything.

The mechanic: webcam as context, hand wave as UI

The flow is intentionally simple. Turn on the camera. Overlay nearby business options. Use a wave to move through results. Use a click to convert curiosity into action via the listing page.

In local discovery experiences, the strongest persuasion is a live, context-matched preview of usefulness rather than a feature claim.

Why it lands: it removes the “so what” gap

Most directory and local-search advertising dies in the space between promise and proof. This banner collapses that gap. You see your own context first, then you see results, then you can act. The interaction is the explanation.

Standalone takeaway: The fastest way to make a utility app feel essential is to let people experience the “aha” moment before they ever leave the page they are on.

What Yellow Pages is really trying to achieve

The business intent is to reposition Yellow Pages as modern, digital, and situationally useful, not just a legacy directory brand. The banner also creates a clear performance path. Engagement inside the unit, then click-out to a listing that can drive calls, visits, or follow-on app consideration.

What to steal from this execution

  • Mirror the product in the ad. If the product is a tool, make the ad behave like the tool.
  • Use one gesture people understand. A wave as “next” is instantly legible. No tutorial needed.
  • Keep the ladder of commitment short. Preview. Browse. Click through. No extra steps.
  • Make the experience readable for bystanders. In shared environments, obvious motion plus clear on-screen change sells the mechanic.
  • Watch privacy optics. If you turn on a camera, be explicit that it is for interaction and context, not identification.

A few fast answers before you act

What is a “location based banner”?

It is a banner ad that adapts its content to the user’s situation, typically location or environment cues, so the ad can show relevant nearby options instead of generic messaging.

How does this Yellow Pages banner work?

It opens a webcam view, overlays nearby business options, lets you wave to cycle through businesses, and lets you click a result to open the corresponding Yellow Pages listing.

Why use a webcam at all?

Because it makes the experience feel immediate and personal. The ad becomes a live “finder” interface rather than a static claim about finding things.

What makes gesture-controlled banners risky?

Friction and variability. If the gesture detection fails or is unclear, users assume the ad is broken. The interaction must be forgiving and the feedback must be instant.

What is the safest way to replicate the idea today?

Keep the mechanic to one simple input, provide clear on-screen feedback, and ensure the user can still get value even if they do not enable the camera.