Lexus ES: Print Ad That Comes Alive on iPad

You are flipping through Sports Illustrated and a Lexus ES print ad starts behaving like a screen. The car appears to change color, its headlights flare on, the interior reveals itself, and the whole moment syncs to music.

On a number of occasions I have featured examples of brands creating interactive print ads. In this latest example, the new Lexus 2013 ES is seen changing colors, turning on its headlights and exposing its interiors while music plays in this interactive print ad for the Oct. 15 Sports Illustrated issue.

Paper as a “display”

The trick is not that the magazine suddenly has electronics inside it. The page becomes a physical overlay, and the motion comes from a second screen underneath it. Place the ad over an iPad while the matching Lexus ES video plays, and the printed ink acts like a mask that makes the animation feel like it is happening on the paper itself.

Definition-tightening: an interactive print ad is a print execution that becomes dynamic when paired with a second screen, using the page as the interface and the tablet as the light and motion source.

In premium automotive marketing and magazine environments, this approach keeps the experience on the page while still delivering the “wow” of moving imagery.

Why this beats the usual print-to-digital handoff

Most interactive print ideas send you away from the page via QR codes, short links, or app installs. This one does the opposite. It pulls the digital layer into the print moment, so the reward arrives immediately and visually, without asking the viewer to leave the ad context.

What Lexus is buying with this execution

This is not primarily a spec demo. It is a perception demo. The ES positioning is “advanced technology elevated by style”, and the format reinforces that promise by making a traditionally static medium feel newly technical. The ad itself becomes proof of the claim.

What to steal for your next print innovation

  • Keep the interaction on the page. If you can deliver the payoff in the same frame, attention holds.
  • Use a familiar object as the interface. A magazine page is intuitive. No learning curve.
  • Design one signature reveal. Headlights, interior, color shift. Pick the one moment people will retell.
  • Make it work in low light. If the illusion depends on contrast, design the experience so it still reads in real life.

A few fast answers before you act

How does this “interactive print ad” actually work?

The print page is placed over an iPad while a synced video plays underneath. The page acts as a mask, so the animation appears to live on the paper.

Is the interactivity coming from electronics inside the magazine?

No. The motion, light, and sound come from the tablet. The magazine page provides the physical overlay and the illusion of print moving.

Why is this more engaging than a QR code in a print ad?

The payoff is immediate and stays on the page. QR flows add steps and send the viewer away, which increases drop-off.

What is the brand advantage of doing it this way?

The medium becomes the message. The execution demonstrates “technology plus design” through the experience itself, not just through copy.

What is the key execution risk?

If alignment, lighting, or setup friction is too high, the illusion breaks and the viewer quits before the reveal lands.

Kellogg’s Tweet Shop: Pay with a tweet

Last month in London, Kelloggs setup a pop up store where passers-by who walked in could try the low calorie snacks and then post a review on Twitter. “Special K girls” in red dresses who manned the store, checked each customer’s tweet before handing over a packet of Special K Cracker crisps.

How the Tweet Shop turns sampling into distribution

The mechanic is deliberately lightweight. Walk in, try the product, then publish a short reaction on Twitter before you leave. Staff verify the tweet on the spot, then you get a pack to take away.

A “pay with a tweet” activation is a pop-up retail format where the transaction is a public social post rather than money, converting product sampling into earned reach and searchable social proof.

In global FMCG marketing, this kind of social-to-sample loop works when the “payment” is fast, public, and directly tied to a tangible reward.

Why it lands: the tweet is both receipt and recommendation

Most sampling disappears into a bag with no trace. Here, the brand creates a visible record of trial. Each tweet acts like a receipt that confirms participation, and a micro-endorsement that other people can stumble on later.

The red-dress staffing is not just costume. It makes the interaction unmistakably “Special K” in photos, which helps the moment travel beyond the store.

What Kellogg’s is buying with “social currency”

  • Frictionless trial. People try a new product with zero financial risk.
  • Instant word of mouth. Reactions publish in real time, while the experience is still fresh.
  • Searchable proof. A hashtag-based trail can cluster impressions and sentiment in one place.
  • High street theatre. A pop-up adds “I was there” energy that a standard promo rarely achieves.

What to steal for your next “pay with a post” idea

  • Make the ask specific. Tell people exactly what to post and keep it short enough to do without thinking.
  • Verify fast. The handover moment should feel immediate, or it stops being fun.
  • Reward honesty. If you only want praise, people feel manipulated. If you invite real reactions, the format feels fair.
  • Design the store for photos. If the space is not camera-ready, you waste the free distribution you just created.

A few fast answers before you act

What is the “Tweet Shop” concept in simple terms?

It is a pop-up shop where people receive a product after posting a tweet about their experience, with staff checking the post before the handover.

Why would a brand accept tweets instead of money?

Because a public post can create awareness and credibility at scale, while the product cost stays predictable and controlled.

What makes this different from a normal free sample?

The sample creates a visible social trace. Each person who tries it leaves behind a shareable review that others can discover.

What is the biggest risk with “pay with a tweet” activations?

If the ask feels forced or takes too long, people opt out. If the experience is not worth sharing, the format collapses into awkward bribery.

How do you judge whether this worked?

Track trial volume, unique posts, sentiment, and whether conversation continues after the pop-up closes, not just during the event.